Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:34:13 -0500
From:      Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, "re@FreeBSD.org Engineering Team" <re@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc
Message-ID:  <521756C5.6050502@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <521754E6.3030906@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <CAE-m3X324rbdP_C=az4eO-EkMcR-yFAeRG7S4q%2BMUsnMezGddw@mail.gmail.com> <5CE4B5FA-9DA0-45E4-8D67-161E0829FE6B@FreeBSD.org> <52173C8D.20608@freebsd.org> <D879DDDA-EF9D-470A-A82E-04E83DB2A7E4__13641.8188493282$1377255996$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> <521754E6.3030906@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/23/13 07:26, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/08/2013 14:06 David Chisnall said the following:
>> Our gcc is from 2007.  It has no C11, no C++11 support.  It has bugs in its
>> atomic generation so you can't use it sensibly without lots of inline
>> assembly (which it doesn't support for newer architectures) for
>> multithreaded things.
>>
>> Our libstdc++ is ancient and doesn't work with modern C++ codebases.
> On the other hand these tools are perfect for building FreeBSD kernel and base.
> Extrapolating my experience with base GCC I am very confident in it as a
> FreeBSD development tool.
> Extrapolating my experience with Clang I am not yet confident in it as a
> FreeBSD development tool.
>

This isn't even true. As CPUs gain new features, the set of available 
intrinsics gets more and more ancient, requiring ever more patching, 
workarounds, and #ifdef. Just look at the original subject of this thread!

We're just talking about the default of a make.conf setting here. 
Switching to clang is a long-term goal of the project for good reason. 
Other vendors (Apple, for instance) have made the plunge first. This 
seems like as good a time as any to do it. And if it goes wrong somehow, 
we have lots of BETAs and it is trivial to change back at any time.
-Nathan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521756C5.6050502>