Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:36:46 -0600 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, dougb@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: conf/104884: Add support EtherChannel configuration to rc.conf Message-ID: <20070205163646.GB48768@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <45C757FA.2000209@FreeBSD.org> References: <20061029010934.5afef73e.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200610281610.k9SGAIVb051055@freefall.freebsd.org> <20070129000459.b2dba4e0.nork@FreeBSD.org> <45C757FA.2000209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:14:50PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:10:18 GMT > > FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> Thank you very much for your problem report. > >> It has the internal identification `conf/104884'. > >> The individual assigned to look at your > >> report is: freebsd-bugs. > >> You can access the state of your problem report at any time > >> via this link: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104884 > >>> Category: conf > >>> Responsible: freebsd-bugs > >>> Synopsis: Add support EtherChannel configuration to rc.conf > >>> Arrival-Date: Sat Oct 28 16:10:18 GMT 2006 > > > > I chased HEAD. Please see following patch. > > Anyone, please handle this PR? > > And I'll make a patch for 6-stable. > > > > I've made my comments on this. Maybe someone else should review it? It seems basicly fine and should be useful. (At least until someone finally shoots the netgraph part of ng_fec in the head.) I'd like to see "" be the offical way to not configure any fec interfaces. gif_up's use of NO is a mistake (IMO). It would be OK to allow "NO" as an undocumented synanim for "". -- Brooks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070205163646.GB48768>