Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:59:23 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Cc: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Like it or not, Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software in the core Message-ID: <20101006225923.GA18732@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <86pqvnxbre.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86fwwjyurd.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20101006215345.1a57c45c@gumby.homeunix.com> <86pqvnxbre.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:16:37PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "RW" == RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> writes: > > RW> It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if it's > RW> required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's needed if > RW> it's needed. > > But doesn't this then shift the burden to every exporter, knowing or > unknowing, willing or unwilling? > > > Seems like an onerous burden. Is it well-documented? Since it essentially says that if you export it from the USA you will have to follow whatever laws and regulations covers such exports, it doesn't really add any burden since anybody doing such an export would be legally required to do so anyway. AFAICT the paragraph in question does not add any restrictions or burdens, it just points out potentially existing ones. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101006225923.GA18732>