Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 12:41:22 +0200 From: Nadav Eiron <nadav@barcode.co.il> To: mitch@hardware.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FWTK, IPFW,or Socks Message-ID: <32F46F52.32F7@barcode.co.il> References: <199701312304.PAA26368@proxy1.ba.best.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mitch James wrote: > > Hi All, > I have one static IP and a private network connected through my FreeBSD > system. Using C Mott's version of PPP for NAT right now. I want to > be able to have http requests on port 80 to be forwarded to one of > the machines using the 192.168.x.x addresses. If I understand from > earlier disscussions, I can do this by using one of three processes. > FWTK, IPFW or Socks. My question is which in your opinion would be > best to use? Which would offer the most flexibilty/less hastle, for > future changes with my network? Thank you in advance. > Cheers, > mitch > _____________________________________________________ > Mitch James Living Near Latte' Land > mitch@hardware.com James Lumber & Ace Hardware > www.hardware.com www.hardware.com/complist.html >From what I unedrstand, you want to have a server that will appear to run on port 80 of your official address but will actually be running on an internal machine, right? I think that in this case the TIS FWTK will be the easiest solution. You'll only need to build http-gw out of it, run it on port 80 and tell it that it's default http server is your internal machine. Nadav
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32F46F52.32F7>