Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:08:35 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Like it or not, Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software in the core Message-ID: <86vd5ex6ks.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <20101006225923.GA18732@owl.midgard.homeip.net> (Erik Trulsson's message of "Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:59:23 %2B0200") References: <86fwwjyurd.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20101006215345.1a57c45c@gumby.homeunix.com> <86pqvnxbre.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20101006225923.GA18732@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Erik" == Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> writes:
Erik> Since it essentially says that if you export it from the USA you will
Erik> have to follow whatever laws and regulations covers such exports, it
Erik> doesn't really add any burden since anybody doing such an export would
Erik> be legally required to do so anyway.
Erik> AFAICT the paragraph in question does not add any restrictions or
Erik> burdens, it just points out potentially existing ones.
Yes, you always have to obey the law when you export. But this clause
seems to imply that the associated software *knowingly* triggers the
export laws, probably in a bad way.
Do you have a different opinion, and is it a legal opinion?
Either this clause needs to be hoisted to the front page of the FreeBSD
distro proper ("Some software contained within may be subject to...")
or it should be removed from this software entirely.
Burying it is irresponsible.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>;
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86vd5ex6ks.fsf>