Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:28:01 -0500 From: "Richard Ward" <mh@neonsky.net> To: "Igor Roshchin" <str@giganda.komkon.org>, <marquis@roble.com>, <security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:69.telnetd [REVISED] Message-ID: <00e301c0537b$d221fee0$0101a8c0@pavilion> References: <200011210521.AAA77830@giganda.komkon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems to have worked fine on my 4.1.1-STABLE server, also. Hopefully you will find an answer to your problem soon. -- Richard Ward, Founder Neonsky Internet Services http://www.neonsky.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Igor Roshchin <str@giganda.komkon.org> To: <marquis@roble.com>; <security@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:21 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:69.telnetd [REVISED] > > > No problem on a 4.0-RELEASE box: > > mailhost: [22:19] [121] /usr/src/libexec/telnetd#patch -p < telnetd.patch.v1.1 Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: ext.h > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/ext.h,v > |retrieving revision 1.7 > |retrieving revision 1.8 > |diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 > |--- ext.h 1999/08/28 00:10:22 1.7 > |+++ ext.h 2000/11/19 10:01:27 1.8 > -------------------------- > Patching file ext.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 87. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys_term.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/sys_term.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.24 > |retrieving revision 1.26 > |diff -u -r1.24 -r1.26 > |--- sys_term.c 1999/08/28 00:10:24 1.24 > |+++ sys_term.c 2000/11/19 10:01:27 1.26 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys_term.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 480. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1795. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: telnetd.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/telnetd.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.22 > |retrieving revision 1.24 > |diff -u -r1.22 -r1.24 > |--- telnetd.c 2000/01/25 14:52:00 1.22 > |+++ telnetd.c 2000/11/19 10:01:27 1.24 > -------------------------- > Patching file telnetd.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 805. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1114. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: utility.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/utility.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.13 > |retrieving revision 1.14 > |diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 > |--- utility.c 1999/08/28 00:10:25 1.13 > |+++ utility.c 2000/10/31 05:29:54 1.14 > -------------------------- > Patching file utility.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 330. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 343. > Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage. > done > > > > Hope, that helps, > > Igor > > > > > Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:26:53 -0800 (PST) > > From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> > > To: security@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:69.telnetd [REVISED] > > > > Anyone have either of these patches run successfully? Here's the > > output from patch -p on a 4.1-RELEASE host. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > #patch -p < /tmp/telnetd.patch.v1.1 > > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |Index: ext.h > > |=================================================================== > > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/ext.h,v > > |retrieving revision 1.7 > > |retrieving revision 1.8 > > |diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 > > |--- ext.h 1999/08/28 00:10:22 1.7 > > |+++ ext.h 2000/11/19 10:01:27 1.8 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file ext.h using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 failed at 87. > > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ext.h.rej > > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |Index: sys_term.c > > |=================================================================== > > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/sys_term.c,v > > |retrieving revision 1.24 > > |retrieving revision 1.26 > > |diff -u -r1.24 -r1.26 > > |--- sys_term.c 1999/08/28 00:10:24 1.24 > > |+++ sys_term.c 2000/11/19 10:01:27 1.26 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file sys_term.c using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 failed at 480. > > Hunk #2 failed at 1795. > > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys_term.c.rej > > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |Index: telnetd.c > > |=================================================================== > > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/telnetd.c,v > > |retrieving revision 1.22 > > |retrieving revision 1.24 > > |diff -u -r1.22 -r1.24 > > |--- telnetd.c 2000/01/25 14:52:00 1.22 > > |+++ telnetd.c 2000/11/19 10:01:27 1.24 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file telnetd.c using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 failed at 805. > > Hunk #2 failed at 1114. > > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to telnetd.c.rej > > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |Index: utility.c > > |=================================================================== > > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/telnetd/utility.c,v > > |retrieving revision 1.13 > > |retrieving revision 1.14 > > |diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 > > |--- utility.c 1999/08/28 00:10:25 1.13 > > |+++ utility.c 2000/10/31 05:29:54 1.14 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file utility.c using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 failed at 330. > > Hunk #2 failed at 343. > > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to utility.c.rej > > Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage. > > done > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------o > > > > -- > > Roger Marquis > > Roble Systems Consulting > > http://www.roble.com/ > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00e301c0537b$d221fee0$0101a8c0>