Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:29:23 -0300 From: Felippe de Meirelles Motta <lippemail@gmail.com> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, lippe@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts/webfonts Makefile pkg-message ports/x11-fonts/webfonts/files pkg-message.in Message-ID: <20080403132923.1bb4396f@shire.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <op.t81lh9m99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <200804030214.m332EV7S005877@repoman.freebsd.org> <op.t81h69mf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20080403123846.6b2e397a@shire.freebsd.org> <op.t81lh9m99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/6W1u3kd_347DTnVNqm5eHCG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Em Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:02:23 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> escreveu: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:38:46 -0500, Felippe de Meirelles Motta =20 > <lippemail@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > > Em Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:50:59 -0500 > > "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> escreveu: > > > >> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:14:31 -0500, Felippe de Meirelles Motta > >> <lippe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> > >> > lippe 2008-04-03 02:14:31 UTC > >> > > >> > FreeBSD ports repository > >> > > >> > Modified files: > >> > x11-fonts/webfonts Makefile > >> > Added files: > >> > x11-fonts/webfonts/files pkg-message.in > >> > Removed files: > >> > x11-fonts/webfonts pkg-message > >> > Log: > >> > - Makefile cosmetic changes. > >> > - Move pkg-message to FILESDIR. > >> > - Bump PORTREVISION. > >> > >> Why need to bump it? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Mezz > >> > >> > > > > Maybe because install-time was changed ? Now too respecting > > NOPORTDOCS. >=20 > I had to ask, because I didn't read your change which only read your =20 > commit message. It's unclear why it was bump. The move pkg-message > to FILESDIR and add NOPORTDOCS don't need to be bump. ;-) Since I > don't see pkg-plist change, so looks like that NOPORTDOCS will break > plist. That part will need to be bump again. >=20 > Cheers, > Mezz >=20 >=20 I agree mezz, because are minor changes! But in Porters Handbook, says: Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: (...) Changes in the packing list or the install-time behavior of the package (e.g. change to a script which generates initial data for the package, like ssh host keys). (...) Thus according to PH's, I think that is correct. --=20 lippe@FreeBSD.org Felippe de Meirelles Motta --Sig_/6W1u3kd_347DTnVNqm5eHCG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkf1BeMACgkQEv+IlQvbYkp1OACdHD6JvJS4I4Z1Mj4EL+QSv7sK rGQAn127+E9uy2D+i183SX7bAtbEwqxt =feyk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6W1u3kd_347DTnVNqm5eHCG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080403132923.1bb4396f>