Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:04:02 -0800
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>
To:        Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r260927 - head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes
Message-ID:  <41A37346-1D5A-4644-974E-F41AB1575221@felyko.com>
In-Reply-To: <201401202149.s0KLnxwQ099689@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201401202149.s0KLnxwQ099689@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 Jan 2014, at 13:49, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Author: gjb
> Date: Mon Jan 20 21:49:59 2014
> New Revision: 260927
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/260927
>=20
> Log:
>  Trim copyright years.
>  Add missing punctuation.
>  Use <quote></quote> in place of literal quotes.
>=20
>  Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
>=20
> Modified:
>  head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml
>=20
> Modified: head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml
> =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D
> --- head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml	Mon Jan =
20 20:56:09 2014	(r260926)
> +++ head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/article.xml	Mon Jan =
20 21:49:59 2014	(r260927)
> @@ -12,20 +12,6 @@
>   <pubdate>$FreeBSD$</pubdate>
>=20
>   <copyright>
> -    <year>2000</year>
> -    <year>2001</year>
> -    <year>2002</year>
> -    <year>2003</year>
> -    <year>2004</year>
> -    <year>2005</year>
> -    <year>2006</year>
> -    <year>2007</year>
> -    <year>2008</year>
> -    <year>2009</year>
> -    <year>2010</year>
> -    <year>2011</year>
> -    <year>2012</year>
> -    <year>2013</year>
>     <year>2014</year>

Is this a good idea?  I've heard arguments that keeping all these years =
is the right approach, but at least we should have 2000-2014, no?


--
Rui Paulo






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41A37346-1D5A-4644-974E-F41AB1575221>