Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:12:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405221409080.17110-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp4qq8h6ju.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 22 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes: > > Yet another also, MySQL uses scope system threads by default > > instead of scope process threads. Scope process threads seem > > to perform better. >=20 > Excuse me for digressing, but do you threads guys have some kind of > occupational nerve damage which prevents you from using correct > grammar? Why does everybody insist on talking about "scope system > threads" and "scope process threads" instead of system-scope and > process-scope threads? Sorry, probably because that's how POSIX defines them (PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM, PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS). --=20 Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10405221409080.17110-100000>