Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:38:01 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml Message-ID: <CADLo83-Dsh_NR1HDnYtr7fn_J2GSYbriV_YqvC5%2BRA-9XvzfXA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201109071830.p87IUg4T031545@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201109071830.p87IUg4T031545@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 September 2011 19:30, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org> wrote: > delphij =A0 =A0 2011-09-07 18:30:42 UTC > > =A0FreeBSD ports repository > > =A0Modified files: > =A0 =A0security/vuxml =A0 =A0 =A0 vuln.xml > =A0Log: > =A0Document two OpenSSL vulnerabilities. > > =A0(There is no OpenSSL 0.9.8s in the ports so mark <1.0.0 as vulnerable)= . <range><ge>1.0.0</ge><lt>1.0.0_6</lt></range> <range><ge>0.9.8</ge><lt>1.0.0</lt></range> I'm sure there's a simple answer, but why not use: <range><ge>0.9.8</ge><lt>1.0.0_6</lt></range> ? Perhaps your explanation was in the comment above, but I couldn't quite understand it... Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-Dsh_NR1HDnYtr7fn_J2GSYbriV_YqvC5%2BRA-9XvzfXA>