Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:20:26 +0100 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/local/etc/shells Message-ID: <20010128082026.360a41ab.steveo@eircom.net> In-Reply-To: <20010127165941.A18749@spawn.nectar.com> References: <20010127091814.567fda08.steveo@eircom.net> <XFMail.010127002713.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20010127135740.7183f71f.steveo@eircom.net> <20010127131722.A17867@spawn.nectar.com> <20010127204859.552fc9a9.steveo@eircom.net> <20010127165941.A18749@spawn.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:59:41 -0600 "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> wrote: JV> I thought you might add it as a different source, so that it need not be JV> the default. As I read it that is still a complementary possibility. The nsdispatch stuff could move the start point from /etc/shells to some other path. The include chain mechanism allows the config to be spread. Have I correctly understood what the nsdispatch stuff can do ? Is it expected to MFC or wait for 5.0 ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010128082026.360a41ab.steveo>