Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 19:23:18 -0800 From: Dmitry Kohmanyuk =?KOI8-R?B?5M3J1NLJyiDrz8jNwc7Ayw==?= <dk@farm.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetAtalk doesn't work!? take two Message-ID: <19971106192318.04591@dog.farm.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971106204252.7018H-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from "Chuck Robey" on Thu, Nov 06, 1997 at 08:44:20PM -0500 References: <13067.878867051@time.cdrom.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971106204252.7018H-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 06, 1997 at 08:44:20PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > > Folks, please don't ask me for any extra little administrative tasks > > like this right now - I'm just not up for it. I'm willing to edit the > > ERRATA file under 2.2.5-RELEASE on wcarchive as things come up, and if [...] > I'm glad you didn't. With all the complaints we've had recently from the > announce list about the ports update, doing what was suggested below would > cause outaged screams. We don't need to be louder on our low volume > lists. Hm. I said 2 weeeks or on security bug. I suppose people who install FreeBSD do agree to receive such amount of mail. I can be wrong, of course ;-) Maybe some other sort of `important information' broadcasts can be developed. I just don't think `watch for errata on web page' is perfect.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971106192318.04591>