Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:46:53 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
Cc:        Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: cpuset and affinity implementation
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802262341010.11586@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080226121251.V920@desktop>
References:  <20080220175532.Q920@desktop> <20080220213253.A920@desktop> <20080221092011.J52922@fledge.watson.org> <20080222121253.N920@desktop> <20080222231245.GA28788@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080222134923.M920@desktop> <20080223194047.GB38485@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080223111659.K920@desktop> <20080223213507.GD39699@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080224001902.J920@desktop> <20080225231747.GT99258@elvis.mu.org> <20080225143222.B920@desktop> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802252003060.3971@sea.ntplx.net> <20080225160433.P920@desktop> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802252110280.3971@sea.ntplx.net> <20080225194320.V920@desktop> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802260121160.6723@sea.ntplx.net> <20080225213434.L920@desktop> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802261021560.8556@sea.ntplx.net> <20080226121251.V920@desktop>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jeff Roberson wrote:

>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>> 
>>> See above discussion.  I'm not sure what you mean by 'default' cpuset 
>>> here.
>> 
>> I imagine the 'default' cpuset as the system's default cpuset,
>> in lieu of any administratively created cpusets and bindings
>> for the process (inherited or explicit).
>
> My opinion is that if we decide that it's important to assign numbered sets 
> to tids we need then to allow cpuset_getid to return multiple ids for 
> WHICH_PID.

Maybe there shouldn't be WHICH_PID.  Perhaps it should be called
WHICH_ALLTIDS.  Then it might appear more expected if
cpuset_getid(WHICH_ALLTIDS, ...) returned multiple cpusets.
I realize this is just playing with words, and I do prefer
WHICH_PID :-)

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0802262341010.11586>