Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:00:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207799] [new port] textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1: clone of textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline just in version 1 Message-ID: <bug-207799-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207799 Bug ID: 207799 Summary: [new port] textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1: clone of textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline just in version 1 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ports@toco-domains.de Flags: maintainer-feedback?(ruby@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 167842 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D167842&action= =3Dedit shar with new port textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1 Hello, attached a new port textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1. We already have a port textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline, which currently contains version 2.x. Sadly version 1.x and 2.x are not compatible and the new port www/gitlab currently needs 1.x. Therefore i've created this new port. Is should just last as long as GitLab needs the old version and will be removed after that. poudriere build fine for: 9.3 amd + i386 10.1 amd + i386 10.2 amd + i386 11-current r293820 amd + i386 portlint is also fine. And i did a runtime test to verify that the port is loadable and usable! Greetings, Torsten --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207799-13>