Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Jun 1999 20:27:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
To:        morten@seeberg.dk (Morten Seeberg)
Cc:        zvi@zvi.t-networking.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 2 ethernet cards
Message-ID:  <199906040027.UAA28041@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
In-Reply-To: <00d101beadf1$5fe32d80$16b4010a@msb.int.danadata.dk> from Morten Seeberg at "Jun 3, 99 08:46:21 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Morten Seeberg wrote,
> I believe FreeBSD follows the IP rule which states, that you cannot use the
> first and last subnet, when you subnet. Which means, that you need to subnet
> in to 4 nets, and not use the first and last. If so, could this not be the
> problem?
> 
> Someone correct if Im wrong?

You are wrong (unless your routing daemon is _ancient_). According RFC
1812 subnets of all zeros or all ones are legal and should be
supported by all routers. 
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@home.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906040027.UAA28041>