Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:02:26 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Dave+Seddon <dave-dated-1125455574.45eb32@seddon.ca> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Gary D. Margiotta" <gary@tbe.net> Subject: Re: Aggregate network interfaces Message-ID: <20050826040226.GB28894@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <1125023574.72285.TMDA@seddon.ca> References: <20050825220248.E9058@kerplunk.tbe.net> <1125023574.72285.TMDA@seddon.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:32:52PM +1000, Dave+Seddon wrote: > - There is no easy way to "bond" on FreeBSD, but you can just use multipl= e=20 > IP addresses. It would be cool to have something like Etherchannel, but= =20 > that doesn't work. Solaris has Etherchannel.=20 FreeBSD has EtherChannel support. See ng_fec(4). Etherchannel is of no use for two hosts talking to each other since the algorithm chooses a nic based on the pair of hosts. ng_one2many may also be of interest for some applications. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDDpRRXY6L6fI4GtQRAg/hAJ0dGIpCx3uS5KepVJEzPQ7LFAEG2wCg4qAn +6IUowsfdBoA/AgpK9THiw0= =Htv0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050826040226.GB28894>