Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      02 Jun 2003 10:29:47 +0200
From:      Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>
To:        mjacob@feral.com
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCSI tape data loss
Message-ID:  <1054542587.1578.1772.camel@rufus>
In-Reply-To: <20030601165751.H97138@beppo>
References:  <1054490081.1582.1685.camel@rufus> <2846020000.1054498114@aslan.scsiguy.com> <1054503893.1578.1723.camel@rufus>  <20030601165751.H97138@beppo>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, after a bit more thought, I realized this was the
case, thanks.

In any case, both buffered and async writes are turned off by
default.

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 02:00, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> Of course linux has async && buffered. Linux has to copy the data from
> user space to kernel buffers and *then* write them. This leads to an
> obvious desire to overlap such writes. The same feature was available in
> Solaris 2.5 as well.
> 
> 'Buffering' as we talk about here typically means the device buffers
> themselves. You don't want to turn this off. You don't want to turn this
> off. You don't want to turn this off. The only device that I know of
> that really *has* to have this off is the old M4 1/2" reel drive because
> it would discard buffered data when it saw the early warning marker.
> 
> I have a longer answer to the previous mail about to go out.
> 
> -matt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1054542587.1578.1772.camel>