Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:24:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: craig@yekse.gank.org Cc: attilio@freebsd.org, Allan Jude <freebsd@shellfusion.ca>, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! Message-ID: <200707142124.l6ELOwk9049954@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20070714181125.GA54021@nowhere> References: <20070702203027.GA45302@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <46925324.9010908@freebsd.org> <3bbf2fe10707091140h6cdc7469nac5be03a8c8a60cb@mail.gmail.com> <200707092000.29768.dfr@rabson.org> <200707092149.l69LnXe9023835@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20070712175252.GA77654@nowhere> <20070712180750.GB77654@nowhere> <20070713204604.GA14827@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20070714181125.GA54021@nowhere> you write: >On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:46:04PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: >> Okay what do you guys think about the following patch for now: >> (the SMP thing might actually be the cause for ports/113430, can >> someone verify?) > >I wonder if perhaps the port should be marked NO_PACKAGE, since quite a >bit depends on kernel parameters that may be different on the build >machine. Actually it originally had NO_PACKAGE because of this (and the fact that kqemu wasn't opensource back then), but kris changed that to RESTRICTED in order to enable pointyhat builds. Do other kld ports still have NO_PACKAGE? I agree that using packages for klds usually is a bad idea, maybe we need a new variable that only allows packaging for pointyhat in order to test compilation... > >Or at least a big scary warning in pkg-message that it will probably >crash if you install from a package and have a non-GENERIC kernel. ...or the package is older than your kernel (especially on -current), yeah thats a good idea (which I just committed.) Thanx, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200707142124.l6ELOwk9049954>