Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:58:59 -0500
From:      Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
To:        "James E. Housley" <jeh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 64 bit counters again
Message-ID:  <20020114105859.A24635@technokratis.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C42E899.CB21BD0A@FreeBSD.org>; from jeh@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:18:01AM -0500
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.41.0201132057560.62182-100000@prg.traveller.cz> <3C41F3FD.4ECC8CD@mindspring.com> <20020113231459.GA30349@voi.aagh.net> <3C42390A.F9E9F533@mindspring.com> <3C42E899.CB21BD0A@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:18:01AM -0500, James E. Housley wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 
> > My personal opinion is that the utility of the counters is
> > mostly in the examination of small deltas, or delta measurement
> > over intervals (c.v. the recent "sar" discussion); is there a
> > particular reason that making them more expensive to get 64
> > bits of accuracy is needed to fulfill?
> > 
> 
> Right now I am trying to do network usage on the overflows the 32 bit
> counters in 60 120 seconds.  That means the netstat values are useless,
> mrtg and other programs that poll for results every 5 minutes or so are
> useless.  If I want to get good data I have to get the counts every 10
> seconds or so to get reasonable results.

  You know, if you have a counter overflowing in 60 to 120 seconds,
then perhaps what it's counting should not be counted to begin with.

  I stumbled upon several statistics issues while writing mb_alloc and
I tried to the best of my abilities to group the manipulation of the
counters under some common already existing lock. In some odd cases,
this was impossible. But I refused to introduce a bus-locked instruction
or, worse, a whole new lock just to deal with the statistics. It's
too much overhead for mere statistics and, in the latter case, it's
even very bug-prone. To be honest, after actually examining more
closely what the counters collected statistics on, I realized that they
were pretty much totally redundant and am considering removing those
few problematic ones some time in the future.

> Jim
> -- 
> /"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
> \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
>  X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
> / \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
> jeh@FreeBSD.org      http://www.FreeBSD.org     The Power to Serve
> jim@TheHousleys.Net  http://www.TheHousleys.net
> jhousley@SimTel.Net  http://www.SimTel.Net
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to
> spell a word."
>     -- Andrew Jackson

Regards,
-- 
 Bosko Milekic
 bmilekic@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020114105859.A24635>