Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:08:43 +0200 From: Bernhard Valenti <bernhard.valenti@gmx.net> To: Roman Shterenzon <roman@harmonic.co.il> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ICQ behind natd masquerade Message-ID: <20000921150843.A12529@cipher.home.at> In-Reply-To: <969526426.39c9cc9ac0952@webmail.harmonic.co.il>; from roman@harmonic.co.il on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:53:46AM %2B0200 References: <5.0.0.25.2.20000921083515.00a9aad0@10.0.0.55> <969526426.39c9cc9ac0952@webmail.harmonic.co.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sounds plausible.. i changed the timeout for UDP to 600 seconds ( i took a look at the linux icq masq module and that uses 600 too ) in /usr/src/lib/libalias/alias_db.c line 159 maybe its possible to only increase the timeout out for icq ? cause i guess a timeout of 600 can easily flood the table ? regards, bernhard valenti On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:53:46AM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > Just my 0.02$; > The ICQ is uses udp to contact the server; perhaps the natd "forgets" about > your icq session when the interval between the packets is too great? > maybe you need to decrease the interval in icq or increase some timeout > in natd. > However I have no idea if my theory is right, guys, anyone, opinion? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000921150843.A12529>