Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:08:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 28461 for review Message-ID: <20030409120732.O26090@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20030409160401.GA43342@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200304072336.h37Na3xa048094@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030409160401.GA43342@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, David O'Brien wrote: :On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:23:56AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: :> :> On 07-Apr-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: :> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=28461 :> > :> > Change 28461 by peter@peter_daintree on 2003/04/07 16:35:32 :> > :> > use -mcmodel=medium for hammer. Otherwise it generates :> > 32 bit instructions for things like invltlb(). kernel model :> > comes later. :> :> Side topic: are we going to call it amd64 some day instead of x86-64? : :This gets hairy... if the toolchain calls it one thing and we call it :another. AMD marketing is trying to squash the "x86-64" name in favaor :of "AMD64". Note that "AMD64" is what M$ has always called it... so one :has to wonder... http://news.com.com/2008-1082-995885.html mentions about AMD receiving a warmer welcome from M$ than they (AMD) initially thought they were going to get (atleast wrt opteron) Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030409120732.O26090>