Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:11:44 GMT From: "J. Altman" <freebsd-announce@chthonic.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/143713: HTML file instead of Ruby-BDB Message-ID: <201002092211.o19MBiWd027068@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201002092220.o19MK1BN044187@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 143713 >Category: ports >Synopsis: HTML file instead of Ruby-BDB >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Feb 09 22:20:01 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: J. Altman >Release: Fresh install of AMD64 8.0 >Organization: >Environment: >Description: On February 9, at approximately 5 PM EDT, I discovered that portupgrade failed to install because an aspect of Ruby would not install. The "make install" process was run from within portupgrade directory and retrieved, to /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby, a file appropriately named; but the "file" command indicated it was an HTML file; the "more" command confirmed this. The host from which the "make install" process attempted to retrieve the .gz file: files.rubyforge.mmmultiworks.com The content of the file points to comingsoon.pairnic.com. Yes, I did try to update the ports tree before sending this report. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201002092211.o19MBiWd027068>