Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:26:36 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TCP Performance Graphs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0111301523400.3797-100000@niwun.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <20011130125839.A88302@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote: > Since the topic has come up again, I'll provide some graphs, and > go back to my suggestion to see if it gets some traction this time > around. > > http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/fbsdtcp.png I don't think anyone's doubting the importance of larger windows; it's just that we can't do much increasing until they're dynamic. That being said, Matt did post a patch which implements socket buffer autoscaling a few months back. I've been meaning to review it, but haven't had the time. If you can give it some good testing and prove that it provides better performance in most cases (and hopefully no regressions), I suspect that might provide the momentum to get it looked at by more people and committed. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.30.0111301523400.3797-100000>