Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:56:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: jason henson <jason@ec.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf file & CPUTYPE? Message-ID: <20041228065656.GA39874@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1104214719l.1837l.0l@BARTON> References: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0412252006250.3864@Treneq> <20041226015811.GA98109@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104214719l.1837l.0l@BARTON>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:18:39AM +0000, jason henson wrote: > On 12/25/04 20:58:12, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:17:00PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > >> When I ran 'buildkernel' as well as 'buildworld', I used > >> the 'CPUTYPE?=3Di686' directive in the 'make.conf' file. I was > >wondering if > >> it is correct to leave it in the 'make.conf' file now that I am > >finished > >> building a new kernel and updating the system. Would I be better =20 > >off > >if I > >> just removed it, or changed it to 'CPUTYPE=3Di686'. I assumed that =20 > >the > >'?' > >> was just for the 'buildworld' procedure. > > > >Setting it with ?=3D was a bug that was recently fixed. You can cvsup > >and continue to set it with =3D. > > > >Kris > > > What happened to march=3D in make.conf. Has it been depreciated? Not as such, but CPUTYPE does it better (because it also enables cpu-specific asm code in some places, and you don't have to remember gcc syntax). Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB0QO4Wry0BWjoQKURAlnPAJoDQXewZE1Hk/bq1c22WzXV6l7cBwCg0a46 /aEfba4eNHIsLJTbMiCiiME= =+bpE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041228065656.GA39874>