Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@glacier.cold.org> Cc: john@starfire.mn.org, FreeBSD questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "Progress(tm)" on FreeBSD? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.961025122205.16420A-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961025092643.14309C-100000@glacier.cold.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Brandon Gillespie wrote: > Question I have never had answered: you can run BSDI binaries in FreeBSD, > is this native or is it pseudo-emulation, i.e. are you better off getting > FreeBSD-native binaries, or does it really matter? You're always better off with native binaries, but BSDi binaries are the next in line. BSDi and FreeBSD are very similiar on many levels, mainly because they are from the same code base, BSD4.4-Lite. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.961025122205.16420A-100000>