Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:03:46 +0100 From: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting FreeBSD on MPC8540 eval board Message-ID: <47D95E72.1050904@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <62FE92BB-0272-46A7-BDA9-5992FDE2F2D9@mac.com> References: <be2f52430803120811rf734af3ubf8fff00f253a71d@mail.gmail.com> <47D7FA35.30204@semihalf.com> <be2f52430803130138n5d667b9vef2f8c1f2c5bb128@mail.gmail.com> <47D905E8.5020608@semihalf.com> <62FE92BB-0272-46A7-BDA9-5992FDE2F2D9@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> I don't think so, just having miibus should suffice. The problem >> you're having >> is likely caused by a different MAC-PHY topology than is for CDS >> boards the >> port was mainly tested on. >> >> The hidden assumption we currently have requires a 1:1 mapping between >> TSEC >> units and PHY numbers they are 'routed' to. We don't deal too well with >> other/mixed MAC-PHY topologies that various systems can have. > > We fixed this at Juniper. If you're done with TSEC for now, I > can backport the changes... > Hi Marcel, Feel free to commit your fixes. I'm reworking the TSEC driver structure that we discussed, but it's not ready yet, so go ahead. Rafal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47D95E72.1050904>