Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 20:32:12 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: [repost:] qemu; emulators/rtc doesnt send SIGIO, is this patch right? Message-ID: <20040604203211.A95031@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[reposting from -hackers as i found this to be the place where emulators/rtc has been discussed previously] Hi! Is the following patch to the emulators/rtc port right? qemu (ports/emulators/qemu) expects it to send SIGIO and i'm not that good at kernel hacking to know if the following is correct... it seems to work for me tho. (Anyone interested in helping fixing the other problems mentioned in the pkg-message is welcome also. This looks like a coool project...) Index: files/rtc.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/rtc/files/rtc.c,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 rtc.c --- files/rtc.c 13 Mar 2004 21:20:03 -0000 1.15 +++ files/rtc.c 1 Jun 2004 15:46:19 -0000 @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ int opened:1; int enabled:1; } flags; +#if __FreeBSD_version >= 500023 + struct thread *sproc; +#else + struct proc *sproc; +#endif struct callout rtc_handle; struct timespec lasttime; struct selinfo sip; @@ -207,6 +212,7 @@ if (sc->var.flags.opened) return (EBUSY); + sc->var.sproc = NULL; sc->var.flags.opened = 1; return 0; @@ -222,6 +228,7 @@ struct rtc_softc *sc = (struct rtc_softc *) dev->si_drv1; rtc_detach(dev, sc); + sc->var.sproc = NULL; sc->var.flags.opened = 0; return 0; } @@ -261,6 +268,7 @@ break; case RTCIO_PIE_ON: sc->var.flags.enabled = 1; + sc->var.sproc = p; DLog(Linfo, "Enable interrupts"); break; default: @@ -394,6 +402,7 @@ return; /* Wakeup sleepers */ sc->var.woken++; + psignal(sc->var.sproc, SIGIO); selwakeup(&sc->var.sip); wakeup(&sc->var.rtc_ident); Thanks, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040604203211.A95031>