Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 02:43:49 +1000 (EST) From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> To: tom@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance at home) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New routed Message-ID: <199608311643.CAA23478@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> In-Reply-To: <m0uwsYM-00082NC@TomQNX.tomqnx.com> from "Tom Torrance at home" at Aug 31, 96 12:05:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Torrance at home writes: > I still think that the new routed -q deleting a static route is a bug. It's doing precisely what it is documented to do in the default case .. no routing info => a dead interface. The route is then removed after a suitable 'hold down' period. What does the addition (per the man page) of .. net 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 gateway <ISP_address> metric 1 passive .. to /etc/gateways do ? Alternatively, your ISP could advertise a default route, michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608311643.CAA23478>