Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:17:47 +0200
From:      Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: atomic_64 operations
Message-ID:  <419D900B.7080703@he.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <419D333E.7000906@elischer.org>
References:  <419D2FF8.7070602@he.iki.fi> <419D333E.7000906@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:

> I don't remember, but if it's here we probably need to have it on all 
> architectures..
> The 64 bit archs would be ok I guess.. don't know about ARM etc.
>
The atomic manpage states:
     The type ``64'' is currently not implemented for any of the atomic 
opera-
     tions on the i386 architecture.

Which makes me assume all other architechtures should be ok except i386?

Pete

>
> Petri Helenius wrote:
>
>>
>> I found a patch dating back to 2002 implementing atomic 64 bit 
>> arithmetic on i386. Is there a reason why that got never committed?
>>
>> (this is related to my quest reducing mutexes, having 64bit add would 
>> reduce the requirement nicely)
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>> "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?419D900B.7080703>