Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:22:29 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where is LOCALBASE actually defined? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnepxjL0NrXxMk-emaGZmX=%2BD_3MX_zWP3C=g9CB6XAXA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120715221743.GA26377@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120715214758.GA26300@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <CAF6rxg=v_X_p1d%2BoRcZDQbP9Y_fwTk_uU-hnHsCkeFCFdVecJA@mail.gmail.com> <20120715221743.GA26377@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 July 2012 15:17, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > I though LOCALBASE has meaning outside > of the ports system too. Clearly I was wrong. > > So, if I happen not to have the ports tree, > I cannot use LOCALBASE in my makefiles, right? correct. LOCALBASE is a ports tree specific thing. you could define it yourself as follows: LOCALBASE?=/usr/local -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnepxjL0NrXxMk-emaGZmX=%2BD_3MX_zWP3C=g9CB6XAXA>