Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jun 1999 11:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Brad Tucker <zvi@zvi.t-networking.com>
To:        cjclark@home.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 2 ethernet cards (fwd)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906041131590.291-100000@zvi.t-networking.com>
In-Reply-To: <199906040557.BAA02090@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, This works.  Thanks again for everyones help!!

Thanks,
Brad

On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Crist J. Clark wrote:

> Brad Tucker wrote,
> > OK.  the cisco router is 206.117.19.1. 
> 
> The _interface_ on your side of the router is 206.117.19.1. Interfaces
> have IP addresses, not hosts. Associating a machine with an IP will
> cause confusion once there are multiple interfaces on one.
> 
> > It takes a class c and subnets it
> > into 2 subnets. this leaves me with 0-127 and 128-255.  I get half the
> > class c. my half is 0-127.  now strait from the router I plug into the
> > freebsdbox, into ed0 wich is 206.117.19.2. 
> 
> OK, got it.
> 
> > The idea i had was to put two
> > ether net cards itno the freebsd box and make it a router.  So i added the
> > appropriate ifconfig entries, and added another ethernet card ed1. Out of
> > ed1 goes to a hub, and out from the hub go all the macintoshes. 
> 
> This will work if configured correctly.
> 
> > zvis ethernet card is ed0.  
> 
> You just said it had two.
> 
> > What does NATd do and why would I need that.  I
> 
> You can tell NATd to listen on the ed0 interface and when it hears the
> router, 206.117.19.1, arp'ing for machines on 206.117.19.64/26, it
> will answer and it will forward the packets appropriately. But this is
> not the easiest way if you have access to the router's config.
> 
> > tried routed, and that doesnt seem to work.
> 
> It depends if the router will listen to ICMP directs from the FreeBSD
> box (and of course, the FreeBSD box needs to be configured correctly).
> 
> > Is what im trying even possable. 
> 
> Sure is[0].
> 
> > The reason im doing this is to isolate the apple talk network running with
> > netaalk.
> 
> Bet you did not think it would be this much work? :) You have the
> FreeBSD box done right from what I saw in your rc.conf. Those
> ifconfigs should set up the routing table correctly. Now for the
> router, this is what I think the easiest configuration is. All
> commands are how you would tell a FreeBSD system to do this. I don't
> have my Cisco books at home and haven't fiddled enough to know the
> syntax by heart.
> 
> # ifconfig <interface> 206.117.19.1 netmask 0xffffffc0
> # route add -net 206.117.19.64 -netmask 0xffffffc0 206.117.19.2 
> 
> Now that I think of it, the netmask there is not needed, but the way
> to tell the Cisco will be different anyway. Hope this helps.
> 
> [0] We used to have something more elaborate at the office... well, we
>     still do actually. We have a whole C class net, but for hardware
>     reasons (BNC cable) we had to break it up into
>     pieces. Specifically, we have a bunch of 27 bit (32 address, 30
>     usable) nets. We too have a Cisco router. The router has the '1'
>     address of our net[1] and talks locally to the lower 32
>     machines. All of the other 32 host nets are specified as static
>     routes in the Cisco's routing table. All of the other subnets go
>     to one address (30) where a NetWare box (yuck, it predates me
>     at this job) routes 'em all appropriately. And it does work
>     fine... well, when sunspots, moon phases, or tides are not causing
>     the NetWare box to flake out.
> 
> [1] Actually, we have two adjacent C class nets at work. The other C
>     class is comes over the same Cisco on the same interface (the
>     interface is aliased to the '1' address on both nets), and the
>     entire net is on one wire (it goes to some hubs and a Cisco
>     switch, actually). Right now, this whole C class and the lower 32
>     of the other C class are on the same wire really... makes for fun
>     addressing. ;) Oh, and I suck up old machines no one wants (486s,
>     586s) and run a 192.168.0 net in my office behind a NAT box. So,
>     there is another net too. The fun never ends. >:)
> -- 
> Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@home.com
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9906041131590.291-100000>