Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:50:05 +0100 From: "Alexander S. Usov" <A.S.Usov@kvi.nl> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using cpufreq Message-ID: <d11qu7$afn$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <d0s9te$e8n$1@sea.gmane.org> <plop85ll8t507z.fsf@gnu-rox.org> <d118kl$pq0$1@sea.gmane.org> <plop85r7ij8z7a.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> What do you use as you supfile ? (default tag)
RELENG_5
> Here I am using -CURRENT maybe cpufreq has not hit -STABLE.
I decided to give it a try after seeng this in UPDATEING:
20050225:
The cpufreq framework has been merged. As part of this, the sysctls
for acpi(4) throttling have been removed. See cpufreq(4) for the
new sysctl interface. The power_profile script has also been updated,
so you can use performance/economy_cpu_freq in rc.conf(5) to set AC
on/offline cpu frequencies. No new cpufreq drivers have been brought
in with this import but drivers from -current can now be built and run
on -stable.
It looks that the last sentence is a bit incorrect, and should be read as
"No cpufreq drivers have ......"
--
Best regards,
Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d11qu7$afn$1>