Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:08:11 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: .include "files/somefile" before .include <bsd.port.pre.mk> Message-ID: <CCF3F08E-F7B4-11D8-8FA1-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040827013906.5df3c093@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Thanks for help. > > Well, a few day ago when I stepped into the office, one one of my > colleagues desktop (he is running enlightenment wm) I've seen a nice > LCARS Star Trek interface. After spending nearly 12 hours searching the > net for something similar for KDE, but with no luck, I've email kde@ and > lauri@kde.org passed my some links, including an incomplete such a theme > that includes a LCARS skin for xmms, suggesting I try to bring up to > date the theme (it's for kde2). > > Digging around in the ports tree I didn't found any xmms skin port, so I > thought I could do a more complete job that just the LCARS skin. > > Attached are the Make file and distinfo for the master port, which > server also as a meta-port and a Makefile for a slave (skin category, > type) port. http://www.1001winampskins.com/copyright.html says: "you may not link to images and downloadable files found on this website within referring web documents" I'm not sure whether this means manual download. OTOH it says: "All skins found on this site are copyrighted by their respective authors. Detailed copyright information to each individual skin may be included in the corresponding downloadable skin-files." So IMHO it would be best to download the skins, unpack them, examine the copyright and repack them all together in one tgz. > I've wrote a script to parse the WWW site and auto-create each slave > port and I want to use a variant of it for updating and having the > distfiles in another file would make the job much easy. Uhm, I'm not sure whether this will work. Are you sure you won't violate any copyrights by this? > The SKIN_PORTS I want to included from a file (it's commented out in the > Mkefile, not complete, it should be PORTNAME.PORTVERSION so that the > meta-port can RUN_DEPEND on some file to know when a port have changed) Anyway, wouldn't it be better to have just one (or a couple of) collection(s) instead of a huge number of slave ports? > BTW, for DISTFILES like ``ReaperPro(BluE).wsz'', > ``[rustedoldthing].wsz'' I can't make it work, esp. in variables > substitution (see the makefile). This is doable, but probably not worth the effort. Repackaging seems like a viable solution here. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CCF3F08E-F7B4-11D8-8FA1-00039312D914>