Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 05:13:39 -0600 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java binary support in FreeBSD ... Message-ID: <199703281113.FAA02883@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970301123124.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <13303.857054625@time.cdrom.com> <199702271553.KAA01146@dyson.iquest.net>,<199702271553.KAA01146@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Mutt.19970301123124.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> you write: >Geeze, why didn't they implement a ``script is on fd 0'' feature. Good idea, but how about making it fd3 so you can still use it as a filter? (in Version 6 all scripts were run from fd0 and you couldn't pipe to them. it reeked) You could always brand Java scripts by prepending them with: #!/usr/local/bin/javakludge Then have javakludge do a "dd" to strip off the header and put the rest in a tempfile, then pass the rest to java.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703281113.FAA02883>