Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 23:00:08 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Robin Carey <robin_carey5@yahoo.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two problems with 4.8 Message-ID: <xzpr88fs5nr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030405161701.31564.qmail@web10908.mail.yahoo.com> (Robin Carey's message of "Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:17:01 %2B0100 (BST)") References: <20030405161701.31564.qmail@web10908.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robin Carey <robin_carey5@yahoo.co.uk> writes: > 1) There are quite a few warnings produced when compiling a Kernel, We must have different definitions of "quite a few". There are actually very few, and most of them are caused either by implicitly dropped qualifiers or invalid implicit pointer casts. > which is surely a Bad Thing (tm). Not necessarily. > 2) I don't know a lot about ``ISO C99'' but according to > Slackware-8.1 <stdint.h> is part of the standard; FreeBSD-4.8 only > has <inttypes.h>. And from what little I know about ``ISO C99'' the > uint*_t types defined by FreeBSD-4.8 <inttypes.h> should actually be > defined in <stdint.h>. That's how its done on Slackware-8.1. This is not a bug. FreeBSD 4.8 does not claim to conform to ISO/IEC 9899:1999. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr88fs5nr.fsf>