Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:55:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251993 - in projects/pf/head/sys: net netpfil/pf Message-ID: <CAPBZQG22cX3FMcdZGXP81sqQGehyptYCBwmGfpFyVvcTe9L2bg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130621065232.GT1214@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306191337.r5JDbU3c028003@svn.freebsd.org> <CAPBZQG3p5MtjJPcQv28GdfGZBLL7kXCnaX=H1D3ZNQEXYQUUWg@mail.gmail.com> <20130621065232.GT1214@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Before the implementation of the multi-locks. You were able to specify limits and tuning at runtime. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:54:51PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote: > E> Why this cannot be made runtime variable as it used to be since the > E> beggining? > > When was it this way? > > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > -- Ermal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPBZQG22cX3FMcdZGXP81sqQGehyptYCBwmGfpFyVvcTe9L2bg>