Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:04:03 +0300 From: Ivo Vachkov <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, andre@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for information/comment on default-free zone router properties Message-ID: <CADrMwxcQydL1zaUgyV00S9UeJ9spC2f6N%2Bo1rSPFta0WTBeXEw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110830.110126.112533011.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <20110829.155904.08325665.sthaug@nethelp.no> <4E5C8BA7.3080501@freebsd.org> <CADrMwxcN_heh9Vw1isqLKMDZUkm2jJ3iqc_ciAZoCjLWxYrNyQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110830.110126.112533011.sthaug@nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote: > > My interest is purely academic. I would like to experiment with different > > data structures to see if there is a way to increase routing performance > > with large number of routes and interfaces. > > You're more likely to find routers with a large number of routes *or* > with a large number of interfaces. You're less likely to find routers > with both of these at the same time. Something to keep in mind... Yes. I agree, thus my initial question to gather information on the somewhat average case ... > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no > -- Ivo Vachkov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADrMwxcQydL1zaUgyV00S9UeJ9spC2f6N%2Bo1rSPFta0WTBeXEw>