Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:07:32 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files Message-ID: <m3odwu1623.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <200606151336.05905.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> (Mikhail Teterin's message of "Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:36:05 -0400") References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <200606151247.10009.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20060615172505.GA23931@merlin.emma.line.org> <200606151336.05905.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> writes: > This one, too, has no examples of any breakage. The concern expressed in the > PR over people expecting the installed libtool to install the .la files of > and for _THEIR OWN_ software, is adequately addressed by the gnu-libtool > ports. > > So, again, any examples of actual moderately hard to fix breakage resulting > from not installing these? Awaiting... OTOH, I still haven't seen a good reason for deviation from upstream libtool behavior. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3odwu1623.fsf>