Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:25:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports utility library Message-ID: <bug-187926-13-RxCzZ0JVrp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926 --- Comment #17 from Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> --- > if LICENSE= is defined, the license is distributed with the binary. The > question is where there text comes from the ports templates or from the > distribution tarball (or from the ports Makefile with LICENSE_TEXT=) I definitely understand the red-headed stepchild comment. Normally, adding COPYING into PORTDOCS is easier because we're already installing other stuff. In liballium's case, it is the ONLY thing being installed in there, which makes it highly conspicuous. Really I have no opposition to removing it. I'm just concerned that if we don't set LICENSE, and we don't install a copy of the license, then we are not complying with the part that says: * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-187926-13-RxCzZ0JVrp>