Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:52:58 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r360609 - in head/security: arpCounterattack bioapi courierpassd courierpasswd courieruserinfo cracklib cvm distcache distcache-devel dmitry doorman doscan fbopenssl fsh fswatch fwipe f... Message-ID: <53B6A3AA.9000904@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201407041246.s64CkB1g040352@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201407041246.s64CkB1g040352@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/4/2014 14:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Fri Jul 4 12:46:11 2014 > New Revision: 360609 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/360609 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r360609/ > > Log: > Resetting maintainership on ports that have not been staged and without any > pending PR (related to stage) One of those belonged to mono@. Should ports maintained by teams be included in these resets? I would think mono@ would be disbanded before resetting mono ports. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53B6A3AA.9000904>