Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:27:24 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple framework for regression tests in src/tools/regression Message-ID: <20080118172724.GS99258@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200801180922.05736.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200801171731.09873.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080118013331.GP99258@elvis.mu.org> <200801180922.05736.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> [080118 06:42] wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 08:33:31 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> [080117 14:28] wrote: > > > Anyways, comments, etc.? > > > > There is C++ in the base system. > > But none of our regression tools are written in it. I also must confess that > std::pair<> is still a bit ugly though I could provide wrapper macros. > > > You can return a pair by returning a structure which is supported in > > C. > > But the second part of the pair really needs to be an object. Error messages > are printf style with var args, etc. I suppose I could do the whole asprintf() > thing and end up with a 'return fail_err(...)' and have the status methods > return a struct. It's not that big of a deal. go with what works. -alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080118172724.GS99258>