Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 23:40:06 -0800 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pentium Bug to be ignored -- say it ain't so Message-ID: <199711140740.XAA12969@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com> "Re: Pentium Bug to be ignored -- say it ain't so" (Nov 13, 9:04pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 13, 9:04pm, Sean Eric Fagan wrote: } Subject: Re: Pentium Bug to be ignored -- say it ain't so } Note his declaration that this is "hardly a critical emergency". And that } he assumes BSDi has thrown out their solution -- which I haven't heard them } say at all. (I don't know why BSDi withdrew their patch; I can think of } several reasons, actually. And SCO has not, to the best of my knowledge, } withdrew *their* patch.) What SCO patch? The only SCO patch I've heard of is a PPro and P-II microcode patch, and those processors don't have the Pentium lockup problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711140740.XAA12969>