Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:13:38 +0200
From:      Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r254519 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 sys
Message-ID:  <5214D922.6010208@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <5212DCD8.4050004@freebsd.org>
References:  <201308191108.r7JB8aQ4057777@svn.freebsd.org> <5212DCD8.4050004@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20.08.2013 05:04, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 8/19/13 7:08 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> Author: andre
>> Date: Mon Aug 19 11:08:36 2013
>> New Revision: 254519
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254519
>>
>> Log:
>>    Move the global M_SKIP_FIREWALL mbuf flags to a protocol layer specific
>>    flag instead.  The flag is only used within the IP and IPv6 layer 3
>>    protocols.
>
> weeeeelllll, "maybe"
> Layer 2 usage of ipfw could make use of this flag as well.
> Cisco were using L2 ipfw some years back. I don't know if this affects them at all.

L2 firewalls are not affected directly.

-- 
Andre




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5214D922.6010208>