Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 13:59:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Daemonising a Java Process: Possible? Message-ID: <13814.52920.941496.351765@compound.east> References: <13813.27934.606377.693358@compound.east> <199809082154.WAA00626@fdy2.demon.co.uk> <199809091441.IAA13097@mt.sri.com> <13814.41946.450831.565822@compound.east> <199809091609.KAA14035@mt.sri.com> <13814.45333.5280.235552@compound.east> <199809091655.KAA14592@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Nate Williams on Wed, 9 September: : > : > Specifically, I have a large code on which javac will loop in the : > presence of most kinds of syntax errors. : : Loop? I still don't follow? Loop, as in 'for (;;) continue;' -- with sprinkles. I never get a stack overflow, so I don't think it's recurring infinitely. : Are you compiling all of your sources with : one invocation of javac? No. : Ahh, none of our sources have any circular dependencies for obvious : reasons. :) I must ask, what obvious reasons? There is no way to encapsulate mutual recursion between objects of distinct classes without a circular interface dependency, unless you are willing to resort to reflection/reification -- which I am not for reasons of readability. In particular, I find such recursion to be essential to a clean interface structure when implementing constraint propagation systems that iterate to fixed points. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13814.52920.941496.351765>