Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:49:10 -0500 From: Jason Hunt <leth@primus.ca> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi patch Message-ID: <20030313034910.GA96727@lethargic.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20030313012306.GB13869@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20030301.093910.15267989.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030310232254.GA64763@intruder.bmah.org> <20030313002312.GB96009@lethargic.dyndns.org> <20030313012306.GB13869@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:23:06PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Jason Hunt wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 03:22:54PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > If memory serves me right, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > These patches make my lucent cards almost useful They are in 1Mbps > > > > mode, it seems, but at least they work with a fair amount of > > > > reliability. Don't try to set the media just yet. > > > > > > Hi Warner-- > > > > > > I'm almost hesitant to post this, but I tried this patch, and a > > > Lucent WaveLan Silver card that I have is still a paperweight. > > > > Out of curiosity, what's so bad about these cards? I'll admit that I've > > used nothing other than Lucent cards, but I don't find anything to > > complain about with them. They seem to work fine talking to each other > > and I can't complain about speeds or reliability of the signal. Maybe > > it's just because I have nothing to compare them to? :) > > From my perspective, the problem is that they *were* working fine, but > *now* mine isn't. (Right now, my card probes but is otherwise not > useful for actually moving bits through the air.) When it was > working, I had no complaints about mine either. :-) > I assume you mean in -CURRENT? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030313034910.GA96727>