Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:42:29 -0500 From: Rod Person <roddierod@yahoo.com> To: Ken McGlothlen <mcglk@artlogix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: This is *not* a racist comment Message-ID: <20020102214229.3ddef676.roddierod@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <871yh8i37q.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10201021003360.13371-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net> <87ell8lezp.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> <vwadvwb8ot.dvw@localhost.localdomain> <871yh8i37q.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It was 02 Jan 2002 18:21:45 -0800 when I read this: > swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) writes: > > | I don't recall if he was called a racist, but one should beware the > lawyers. > > That's a good point, but I consider this more of a technocultural thing > rather > than a racist or nationalist issue. The reject messages include an > email > address that works, and if legitimate email is being blocked, I'm more > than > willing to open up a hole for that server. Believe me, this is much > more a > self-defense issue than it is an offensive one. I think I'm missing something(I did erase the original post already)? But why would blocking how can blocking e-mail from a domain be an issue for a lawyer? Don't people have the right to block things from entering their servers? roddierod@yahoo.com "I'm a character in a world gone wrong!" - Entombed - Returning to Madness _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020102214229.3ddef676.roddierod>