Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:46:21 +0100 From: lupe@lupe-christoph.de (Lupe Christoph) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: pkg-plist strict enforcement starting Message-ID: <20050115114621.GD10123@lupe-christoph.de> In-Reply-To: <20050114220835.GC74151@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050113062739.GA28658@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501131148520.25402-100000@pancho> <20050113180504.GA26064@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050114130404.250d6e26@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <20050114112918.GF69532@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050114211206.GF1175@k7.mavetju> <20050114215559.GA71927@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050114220344.GH1175@k7.mavetju> <20050114220835.GC74151@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 2005-01-14 at 14:08:37 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > That would be a big cop-out - it's hardly friendly to make every port > user update to -stable or take manual steps to avoid a broken package > system. There needs to be a better solution than that. How do you make a port depend on a minimum version of another package? A port using a new feature could depend on sysutils/pkg_install, version foo.bar which first supported this feature. LUpe Christoph -- | lupe@lupe-christoph.de | http://www.lupe-christoph.de/ | | Ask not what your computer can do for you | | ask what you can do for your computer. |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050115114621.GD10123>