Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:07:28 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: x11/sessreg fails to build Message-ID: <86zkv7pi8v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinYd0seY8t8hXDdAdtyvcNXDEPFZYk03R7fs-Ny@mail.gmail.com> <861v8l6ckx.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTinV31pktFbobs1KULHTFo__0MGskGQKN%2BOFh_pu@mail.gmail.com> <86aan93fdd.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTikiWBBbLo=gkzLRng_o%2BXthKz9xMS7e6R0XUow9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> writes: > 2010/9/22 Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>: >> David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I have them in /usr/include/utmpx.h >>> >>> At configure stage : >>> >>> checking utmpx.h usability... yes >>> checking utmpx.h presence... yes >>> checking for utmpx.h... yes >>> >>> In config.log there is not something strange but if you want to check >>> it I attached it. >>> >>> By the way I'm running 8.1-RELEASE on amd64. >> >> There is no utmpx.h on 8.1-RELEASE. > > Then it's there because I downgraded from -STABLE, then I should > remove it safely ? No, there is no utmpx.h on /stable/8 as well. And it's unlikely to happen given the nature of the change and absence of MFC tag on utmpx/ulog related commits. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100113194254.GR64905
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zkv7pi8v.fsf>