Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:04:41 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: netch@netch.kiev.ua Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r200369 - in head: etc share/termcap Message-ID: <86ljh7jd0m.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20091213083725.GH1260@netch.kiev.ua> (Valentin Nechayev's message of "Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:37:25 %2B0200") References: <200912102225.nBAMPrZx076758@svn.freebsd.org> <ygek4wtgyp4.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <19235.10488.325168.267306@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20091213083725.GH1260@netch.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Valentin Nechayev <netch@netch.kiev.ua> writes: > I also vote for old variant. If anybody wants to keep previous screen > contents, there are many ways for this (another xterm, screen, less, > etc.), and all they are more predictable and controllable than > alternate screen which isn't loggable and isn't provided by many terminal > implementations. That last part is simply untrue. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ljh7jd0m.fsf>