Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Jul 1998 10:58:51 +0200
From:      sthaug@nethelp.no
To:        drosih@rpi.edu
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Variant Link implementation, continued
Message-ID:  <28706.899542731@verdi.nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 4 Jul 1998 04:14:23 -0400"
References:  <v04011724b1c38fb1854d@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Let's say there are three namespaces (just to pick a number):
> >>      sys
> >>      session
> >>      process
> >
> > This is immediately bad, in that you want a name from the 'session'
> > namespace to be able to (optionally) override a matching name from
> > the 'sys' namespace.
> 
> I don't see the problem.  Which is to say, my proposal was intended
> to let people do just exactly what you are asking for.
> 
> Let's say that the "sys" namespace has a variable called "osversion".
> This value is read-only to most users (except root), and is set to
> the version of freebsd that the machine is actually running.
> 
> The login process may very well copy that "osversion" value to a
> variable in the "session" namespace which is also called "osversion".
> Users can not change the copy of oslevel in the "sys" namespace,
> but they can change the value which is in the "session" namespace.

Aren't you simply reinventing VMS logical names & tables here?

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28706.899542731>